4/27/13
It's very easy to criticize...And it's fun, too!
Posted by Gustav at 9:19 AM 1 comments
Labels: Arnold Schoenberg, atonal music sucks, Ken Keaton, Palm Beach Daily News
3/10/13
Article loads more fun to read than it must have been to write
Chamber Series puffs up to symphony strength
What's not to like about that description about the otherwise bland, yet arduous 7th symphony.
We have heard this symphony live three times in the last four seasons — once from the Los Angeles Philharmonic — and this stands with the best of them.
Of course it does.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do yourself a favor and read the entire article which includes gems like "...and each of its parts deserves to be savored, if only for 10 seconds, in our mental echo chambers."
Posted by Gustav at 12:46 PM 3 comments
Labels: Beethoven, clarity, Harriet Howard Heithaus, Naples Daily News
12/25/12
Oversight(s)
Observer reviews, articles contained duplicated sentences
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cpy
Jimmy: Well, he didn't actually write... any of it.
Kyle: Let me guess: you came up with the joke, and Cartman sat on the couch eating Twizzlers?
Jimmy: Actually, it was potato chips.
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cpy
Joseph Takagi : Hey, we're flexible. Pearl Harbor didn't work out so we got you with tape decks.
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cp
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3732343/observer-reviews-articles-contained.html#storylink=cpy
Posted by Sator Arepo at 7:56 PM 0 comments
11/18/12
Expanding the Parameters, or All Antecedents Have Consequences
Holiday classical musical performances beyond the 'Messiah'
David Weininger, Boston Globe, 11/17/2012Goodness gracious, is it that time already? Never too early to jump back into the shark-infested waters, as my mom always said.*
*May not be true.
Soon it will be Christmas.
Thank heavens for the Boston Globe. Talk about news you can use!
What should you listen to?
Should? Uh...
This is not a simple question.
No shit. What I "'should'" listen to is, apparently, prescribed by to the condition that "soon it will be Christmas." That's a whole thing right there. Perhaps I'm not a nominally Christian white East Coast American male over 55 who gives a shit that it's almost Christmas?
Oh, wait. This is in a newspaper. Well, I guess you have to write to your audience.
Historically, Christmas...
If I said that I didn't like where this was going, I'd be lying...but only because of who I am and the blog for which I write. I'm ten kinds of strapped in and prepared for the least-researched sentence ever.
...has been an immensely prolific time for composers, especially (and obviously) for those writing for the Christian church.
I submit that the sense of "historically" being invoked here is not really anything as broad as the word itself suggests. It seems to me that, here, "historically" means "during the 18th century."
There was actually a relatively short period of time, in a pretty small part of the world, during which most composers were employed by Christian churches.
But, of course, people, places, and times not roughly related to "the last two or three hundred years of European-American history" aren't included in "historically."
But, now, see: perhaps that's exactly what this article is after: breaking the Christmas concert paradigm.
Slow down there, Sator. You're a little rusty at this. Don't be so quick to--
But this trove of musical riches is astonishingly easy to lose sight of, even in so artistically sophisticated a place as Boston.
Wow, okay. I can't imagine that this sort of self-congratulatory onanism is going to live up to my optomistic projection.
It can seem as though holiday offerings are confined to endless renditions of the “Hallelujah” chorus and an all-too-small group of holiday favorites.
Although we're all sick of the Messiah--and I am therefore sympathetic to this sentiment--the contstruction "it can seem" is so unbelievably rhetorically weak that I'm rather put off. Instead of invoking a familiar sensation, "it can seem" could be used to justify any number of terrible, terrible sentences. To wit:
"It can seem like your friend's hot daughter really appreciates your attention."
See?
How to break out of this rut?
By continuing to employ a string of weak grammatical constructions?
One strategy is to explore a Christmas distant in time and space from our own,
...and this is an experience that early music ensembles are especially skilled at providing.
I'm gonna go ahead and write this off as a segue to talking about specific groups in Boston this season, since trying to understand the logic of this sentence in the abstract, as the alternative assumes some kind of non-Euclidian rhetorical space with which I'm not adequately equipped to deal.
Two such groups are Boston Camerata, an ensemble of instrumentalists and singers, and the vocal group Blue Heron. This year, the former is presenting “The Brotherhood of the Star: A Hispanic Christmas,” while the latter is offering a sampling of music for Advent, Christmas, and New Year’s from 15th-century France and Burgundy.
I am in favor of both of these groups. I think it's important to go on the record about that before proceeding.
“There’s a reason we hear ‘Messiah’ and ‘Nutcracker’ every year — because they’re so great,” said Scott Metcalfe, Blue Heron’s music director.
Ha ha yeah that's totally it. We're not lazy or indoctrinated or forcefed a false nostalgia that poisons our present -- they're just so great!
“But doing these sort of alternative, 15th-century Christmases, there’s no sense that they have a holiday anything like ours.”
Translation: the artistic director of an early music ensemble speculates that, based on available evidence, Christmas in 15th century Burgundy was different than Christmas today.
I guess there IS a reason this is in the newspaper (based on available evidence).
This is Blue Heron’s sixth season of holiday concerts — Metcalfe said that in the group’s early years they skipped it because, ironically, many of the singers could make more money doing “Messiah” performances.
Let's leave alone that "it" seems somehow to refer to "sixth season of holiday concerts" and, instead, focus on how "ironically" is "ironically" [sic] being used incorrectly.
Boston Camerata, by contrast, began doing Christmas concerts in the early 1970s under Joel Cohen, now music director emeritus. (He is also directing “Brotherhood.”) Many have proven to be among the group’s most enduring programs.
Many of...its artistic directors? Too many antecedents, not enough consequents. It's what Christmas is all about!
‘For us, there is a desire to pull the curtain open and say, wait a minute, there may be other things out there. Let’s look at them, let’s enjoy them.’ Anne Azéma, the Camerata’s artistic director, said of the impulse behind them: “It came out of a desire to remove oneself from the Christmas routine.”
By putting on a Christmas concert?
By “routine,” she meant “a canon that was developed in the late 19th century in America — a mixture of German-Scandinavian-English music which created this sort of postcard idea of all things that we think now as Christmas.”
Oh. Well, good, then, within the limited scope of expanding that notion to include slightly more European countries over a slightly longer period of time.
That includes the caroling tradition that’s especially strong in Boston, popular songs about chestnuts and angels, “Messiah,” and other time-honored entries.
Since I have a blog, I'd like to take this opportunity to mention that the only thing I hate more than angels (which are, conveniently for me, imaginary) is people who just fucking love angels.
I'm sorry, you were saying something about Christmas concerts?
“It’s wonderful material,...
Is that a nice way of calling it "not music?"
...some of it at least,
Ha.
...but it’s become so overfamiliar that its impact is often lost.”
Ding ding ding!
If I was still an academic postmodernist asshole I'd call it "overdetermined" - but I quit being that, so I won't.**
**Technically, I am no longer an academic.
“In a way, caught among all these things, you tend to forget that Christmas has been happening for quite a while,” she continued.
Like basically since Halloween! Every year!
“For us, there is a desire to pull the curtain open and say, wait a minute, there may be other things out there. Let’s look at them, let’s enjoy them.”
First, this the second time in three quotes you've used the "pull the curtain" analogy. I will refrain from speculating about that.
Second, I like "look at" as a metaphor for "listen to." If you get too literal you scare away the rubes!
Third, this:
These are, nevertheless, holiday concerts, which means that an audience, no matter how adventurous, is going to want something that resonates with their own experience, even if the music is unfamiliar.
Yeah, this is about where I stopped reading, but only partly because the rationalization-to-description ratio became untenable.
Happy Thanksgiving from your friendly if unreliable bloggers at the Detritus Review.
Posted by Sator Arepo at 9:30 PM 2 comments
11/11/12
Jonesing for Sesquicentenniality
Posted by Empiricus at 6:28 PM 4 comments
11/2/11
Critic Is Large; Contains Multitudes, or "Masters Are Masterful"
Exploring Bartok's Legacy With Plenty of Energy
Anthony Tommasini, New York Times, 11/1/2011
Let's leave aside (by which I mean: let's don't) that the title editor made the random choice to capitalize one of the prepositions and not the other. In virtually every style format exactly zero percent of prepositions in titles should be thusly treated, but maybe it's some new quirk in Chicago 16 of which I'm not yet aware; because, hey: if you didn't change a bunch of shit, why would you need to issue a new edition? It's not like every editor in the world is basically required to buy one every time you...oh, right.
Figure 1: The University of Chicago, publisher of the aforementioned eponymous ubiquitous style guide. So that's how they fund their This is, unedited [by me: ed.] and verbatim, the opening sentence in this review; no words have been manipulated to make it appear more prominent than it is.
To declare someone a master makes it sound as if an artist had reached some benchmark of skill and insight, and every performance said master gave would automatically be masterly.
I'm not sure that "mastery" necessarily equates to "consistency," but, yes, that word is thrown around pretty casually.
In fact great musicians work constantly and continually challenge themselves.
Wow. Good thing I read the New York Times, because I just popped into existence about 45 seconds ago and thought that great musicians were, generally, incompetent but insanely fucking lucky.
But: fine. Overused designator. Too-oft typed moniker.
Maybe the definition of a master is elusive.
Wow; that's award-winning stuff right there. You think you can find insights like that in the Post?
But somehow you know one when you hear one, as was clear on Monday night when the pianist Andras Schiff played a recital before a full house of rapt listeners at Carnegie Hall.
Really? Let me get this straight, paraphrase-style:*
"Man, people sure throw "master" around a lot; it's vague to begin with and overuse just makes it kind of meaningless and trite. But man! You should've seen this concert! Dude was a master."
Know what? I got your master right here. Self-proclaimed is the way to go, unless you're going to wait for the Times to come around and, finally, declare you to be such.

*We are aware of all internet traditions.
Posted by Sator Arepo at 8:50 PM 9 comments
Labels: Andras Schiff, Anthony Tommasini, Bela Bartok, Masters are Masterful, New York Times
10/24/11
Thank God! Orchestra Doesn't Play Strauss
Review: ISO's guest artists cast spells with enchanting classics
Jay Harvey, Indianapolis Star, Oct. 15, 2011
You're right. "Guest artists" is much better than providing names.
If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times...always keep them guessing.
Music associated with enchantment begins and ends this weekend's Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra concerts, but the way the program's other major work was performed Friday was no less enchanting.
It's quite a talent that can confusingly introduce a concerts and its program with any specifics. Well done, sir.
Which makes me wonder...what is enchanting music? It's been a while, let's ask Google images!
Jonathan Biss, Bloomington-born and on his way to becoming world-renowned, played the solo part in Beethoven's Piano Concerto No. 2 in B-flat...
Okay, so was this the enchantment asscoiated music, or the enchanting music? I actually, thought this would be more obvious. Silly me.
...with an elegance that didn't get too lofty to convey emotional engagement.
It's a tough balancing act, all that elegance muddying up the emotional engagement.
If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times, just leave the elegance at the door. It's always seemed too elitist for my tastes.
His generally crisp, even articulation never overcame his focus on tone, which had a rounded, singing quality even in leaping passage work.
Wait, are the crisp articulations or the rounded, singing tone the elegant part?
And why, oh why, must two positive attributes of piano-playing (good articulation and focused tone) be mutually exclusive? Thank god for players like Jonathan Biss, who defy the laws of music criticism and are the exception that proves the rule.
I wonder what makes him such a great pianist.
A thoughtful artist with lots of individuality to bring to the classic repertoire, Biss crafted a first-movement cadenza that blended youthful vigor and studied reflection, its resonant climax aided by abundant pedal.
If I've said it once...more youthful vigor and abundant pedal, please!
The slow movement had just enough reserve as its delicate song poured forth,...
Yes...er...uh? Wait...reserved what?
...with the piano's quiet, single-line outburst near the end filling the hall. The consistent brio and polish Biss applied to the finale...
I know, seriously. Someone really should edit those changes into Beethoven's score. I know he's the "greatest composer of all-time", but he really should know better than to leave the brio and polish out of this finale.
I mean, how else is he going to produce an ovation?
...produced a slow-building but insistent ovation...
See. Were they standing?! I sure as heck hope so if they expected to cause a spontaneous (completely unplanned) encore.
...that resulted in an encore: the fifth of Beethoven's Six Bagatelles, op. 126.
If I've said it once...audiences love brio and polish!
In the concerto, guest conductor Gilbert Varga kept the balance and coordination of the orchestra keenly matched to the soloist.
I should hope so.
This was no surprise,...
Oh really? Why?
...given the controlled grandeur and sweep of the program-opener: Mozart's Overture to "The Magic Flute."
Of course! If I've said it once, I've said it thousand times. If you can control the grandeur of Die Zauberflöte Overture, then you are more than ready for the balance and coordination of pre-19th century Beethoven.
But that opera, from which they performed just the famous overture, is so unconventional, what possibly could they pair it with on this concert? A conundrum that has plagued orchestras for centuries.
The unconventionality of that opera from Mozart's last year is nothing compared to the bizarre pantomime scenario for which Bela Bartok supplied a bristling score in the early 1920s.
Really? To which bizarre pantomime scenario are you referring?
Friday's concert ended spectacularly with the suite from "The Miraculous Mandarin."
Hmmm...now I'm a classical music lover, and I've heard of Beethoven and Mozart, and I've even seen Amadeus. So I consider myself an expert on The Magic Flute, and that opera has a guy dressed up as a bird. That's pretty crazy.
What's this Mandarin guy got?
In the story line, some roughnecks commandeer a young woman as sexual bait, forcing her to lure visitors to a seedy apartment.
I'm pretty sure most of Mozart's opera are about the same thing. Basically.
Two hapless men are ejected for insufficient funds, and then the title character proves too much to handle, in ways the complete score details.
Two men kidnap a woman into sexual slavery, but their plans are thwarted when the their home is foreclosed on?
Banks...always screwing the little guy!
Also, that's an odd summary you've written there. "Proves too much to handle..."?
Are these two men the Tim Conway and Don Knotts to the Miraculous Mandarin's orphaned kids from The Apple Dumpling Gang?
figure two hapless men: "You know something, Amos? The Lord poured your brains in with a teaspoon, and somebody joggled His arm. I keep trying to tell you we ain't got no lead to throw, and no powder to throw it with. "The suite is graphic enough so that it would be inaccurate to say the music transcends the sordid plot.
Uh.... Okay, so I totally agree that the music in a ballet should transcend the plot, although I'm certain I have no idea what that means. But how could you even tell if the music is transcending the plot since you're only hearing the suite (without the whole ballet part)?
Or are you suggesting the music is too accurately depicting the graphic storyline? ...a concept I'm having a difficult time actually visualizing.
Oh bother.
Still, it's one of the milestones of symphonic modernism and received a brilliant performance Friday, with Varga and the ISO conveying every snarling or spooky twist and turn.
Sexual slavery aside, it's still a great piece. But "magic" flutes have nipples.
Obscure, early music by Varga's Hungarian countryman Bartok showcased principal guest concertmaster Alexander Kerr.
If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times...why must you vaguely, and somewhat confusingly introduce a piece without giving us the title?
The first of "Two Portraits" features a ceaseless, impassioned violin solo that Kerr sustained beautifully.
He sustained the solo? Is this sustained as in maintained, or as in ratified?
The second one is mocking and vehement; it discards the solo violin -- the composer's payback for a love affair gone awry -- in a performance both idiomatic and picturesque.
I like my vehement mocking picturesque, too!
Wait...what pieces were associated with enchantment?
Posted by Gustav at 1:24 PM 1 comments
Labels: apple dumpling gang, Beethoven, Bela Bartok, if i've said it once, Indianapolis Star, Jay Harvey, Jonathan Biss, Mozart, nipple slips
9/29/11
Complementary work deserves compliments
Review: Harrell finds many subtleties in Dvorak
Bruce R. Miller, Sioux City Journal, September 23, 2011
In great contrast to me, I suppose.
Antonin Dvorak wasn't interested in writing any works for cellos -- ...
He wasn't?
... he didn't think they were good solo instruments.
He didn't?
Thankfully, wiser heads convinced him otherwise and he produced the Cello Concerto in B Minor -- ...
Ah yes, the masterful op. 104. The first and only piece for solo cello that Dvorak ever wrote, not counting the first Cello Concerto in A major, B. 10, his Cello Sonata in F minor, the Polonaise in A major for cello and piano, the Rondo in G minor (which he later orchestrated), the arrangements he made of his Slavonic Dances for cello and piano, or the transcription of Silent Woods for cello and piano, and later for cello and orchestra.
Wiser heads truly did prevail.
...a piece that Lynn Harrell owned Saturday night performing with the Sioux City Symphony Orchestra.
Don't you mean pwned?
Bopping along...
Bopping along? ...in his little red wagon?
...with the orchestra's parts, he practically made the music seem as if it was one of classical music's Top 10.
Which, of course, it's not. Pssh.
To even suggest that this piece belongs in the same esteem as Eine kleine nachtmusik or the William Tell Overture (just the Lone Ranger part, not the rest, of course) is blasphemy. Classical music's Top 10 is a sacred, unalterable law of nature. I mean, would you really have Time Life Recordings remake all those cds?
He got his cello to sing, too, mimicking Lori Benton's superior flute work and justifying the brass section's noble fanfares.
The cello sang, copying the flute and justifying the brass? Sure, that sounds like orchestration 101 to me.
The piece -- part of a Dvorak night -- wasn't one you'd go home humming, but it did have plenty of work for everyone to do.
So, the Dvorak was more like Bill Lumbergh?
figure superfluous Office Space reference, loosely tied to Dvorak: "Hello Peter, whats happening? Ummm, I'm gonna need you to go ahead come in tomorrow. So if you could be here around 9 that would be great, mmmk... oh oh! and I almost forgot ahh, I'm also gonna need you to go ahead and come in on Sunday too, kay. We ahh lost some people this week and ah, we sorta need to play catch up."Harrell, in fact, gave his fingers such a deft workout you frequently wanted a camera on them to see just how he was able to zip from the melodramatic to the sublime.
Precisely, a giant scoreboard with closeups, replays, and the 'kiss cam' in between pieces. Whatever I can do not to listen to the music.
Harrell played well with all sections of the orchestra (even those that had some timing snags) but he was particularly chummy with the woodwinds.
figure chummy: Lynn and the woodwinds reenacting the battle of Antietam. As I assume most woodwind sections do.The adagio showed they were willing to step up to their guest's level and compete. The horns did nicely, too.
I'm sure the horns will appreciate the shout-out.
And that chilling fanfare in the end? It may have been Dvorak's way of putting a button on a request,...
A button?
...but it certainly gave Harrell the rest he needed before launching into a more familar [sic] encore.
Just as Dvorak intended. Subtly, of course.
The rest of the program was filled with other Dvorak works...
As all-Dvorak programs tend to do, from time to time.
... -- the rather passive "In Nature's Realm," the more familiar Symphony No. 7 in D minor.
"Passive", "familiar"...sounds like a Dvorak concert to me.
Still, it was the Lynn and Lori show that impressed.
I love that show.
While the rest of the orchestra got a chance to shine in the third number, it was Benton's complementary work that deserved the compliments.
Are we still talking about the concerto?
Harrell may not have the flash of friends Itzhak Perman and Pinchas Zukerman, but he more than has the skills.
Itzhak Perman?! I realy ove that guy. Seriousy.
Saturday night, he was willing to share them with the Siouxland musicians.
Wait. Itzhak Perman and Pinchas Zukerman were there?
And the result? The result was good, very good.
Gabby Hayes good?
Even better?
Even better than Gabby Hayes, the cello concerto that almost wasn't, and the unrestrained irreverence of the Lynn and Lori Smile-Time Variety Hour!?
If it isn't a complete and utter non-sequitur, and extremely patriotic, I'm not sure it could be any better.
The orchestra started the season with a rousing version of the Star Spangled Banner. While this was probably a given decades ago, it was nice to see it back -- a good way to start what could be a great season.
I know, I was totally in danger forgetting that piece.
Wait...what did you say about subtleties?
Posted by Gustav at 7:42 AM 0 comments
Labels: Bruce R Miller, Civil War Reenactment Land, Dvorak, patriotism, Sioux City Journal, Smile-time variety hour
9/9/11
Friday Quickie: Tales of Not-Quite New Music
Bamberg Symphony Orchestra Review
Iain Gilmour, EdinbourghGuide.com, September 5, 2011
The Bamberg Symphony Orchestra is well-remembered from its five-concert residency at the 2003 Edinburgh International Festival.
Excellent. Sounds like repeat engagement would bring about a wonderful reunion.
Neither memories nor growing repute from widespread touring were sufficient to draw a reasonable-sized audience to the first of its two concerts closing the Usher Hall run in the 2011 Festival.
Hmm. I wonder what the problem was? Also, what's a reasonable-sized audience? How unreasonable could it have been -- was the fire marshal called?
The choice of programme could have been a determining factor.
Really...the choice of programme? I've never heard such an accusation before.
Did they program symphonic U2? Because, there's no way I'd miss that!
An evening devoted solely to Messaien and Bartok is not a sure crowd-puller.
Oh, of course. Composers who, despite being dead (a major plus), had the misfortune of writing music after the era of good music had ended.
That is no criticism of the orchestra or its English conductor Jonathan Nott,...
Of course not. It's not their fault that music after 1900 is awful.
...who has just extended until 2015 a tenure as principal conductor begun in 2000. Nott encouraged and controlled the players admirably in the opening item, Messiaen’s Chronochromie.
Encouragement and mind-control are indeed good tactics, but really, you'll catch larger audiences with Beethoven than you will with Messiaen.
Conventional wisdom, I know, but playing the Messiaen well will never mean as much as not playing it at all.
But since the orchestra has lost their minds, and are probably only performing in front of the cleaning crew and student composers, tell us a little about this piece.
The work encapsulates two ideas – time and colour...
Hence the name.
... – and demands a big orchestra, with the usual percussion section enlarged by gongs, bells, glockenspiel, marimba, cymbals and xylophone.
Wait. Gongs, bells, cymbals, and xylophone are unusual percussion?
figure futuristic instrument: Observe the unusual shape and strange bends in this seemingly normal hunk of metal. For Messiaen sounds had colour and time was expressed by rhythm and duration.
Wait...time was expressed by duration?! That's clearly some freaky shit.
[snip]
The orchestra produced every twist and turn in the score,...
Against their better judgment, I'm sure.
...from “twittering” sections – reflecting the composer’s lifelong interest in bird song -- to “off-key” combinations with accurate sound and precise timing.
Just think how much better this piece would have been had it been "on-key".
Messiaen was a complex character – composer, ornithologist, church organist (for 60 years at Holy Trinity in Paris) and teacher. His spell as Professor of Harmony at the Paris Conservatoire may have had more influence on the development of modern music than his compositions – his students included Stockhausen, Boulez, Goehr, and Kurtag – though he was the first composer to use an early version of an electronic keyboard.
And this is all very important and interesting, of course, providing that no orchestra ever play their music.
Posted by Gustav at 10:36 AM 1 comments
Labels: Bamberg symphony, Bela Bartok, EdinbourghGuide.com, Friday Quickie, Iain Gilmour, new music concerts, Olivier Messiaen, unusual percussion
9/5/11
Writing about Music Still as Awesome as Last Time I Checked
Diamond season off to brilliant start
D.S. Crafts, Albuquerque Journal, 9/2/2011
Don't bother clicking the link; the Journal is, apparently, so awesome – one hopes this is due to its expensive and, ergo, excellent staff of wordsmiths – that they don't just give their advertising-soaked content away for nothing. You can sit through an ad for a trial version if you really want to.
I find this patently fucking offensive. Let's just say I'll be getting my local arts coverage somewhere else from now on.
I guess I could take the print version, but (as a friend of mine always replies when offered a subscription to the Austin American-Statesman) I have neither a bird nor a puppy.
---Begin Digression---
A few words are in order. Yes, it has been a long time; life intervenes. Sue us. Also, the Austin-based percentage of Detritus Review writers went from 50% to 66% to 33% to 0% in the short space of a year.* Doings, as they say, are afoot.
*I was going to make a graph of this, but I didn't.
Clever readers will have already surmised that I have relocated to Albuquerque, along with Mrs Arepo and the cat. (Yes, all bloggers really do have cats. No, you cannot see a picture.) All is well and the chile is excellent and near-daily.
Enough.
---End Digression---
My first and only sojourn into the Albuquerque Journal's Pay-to-Read Arts Coverage was rewarded with the requisite Hacky Classical Music Review Title.
Diamond season off to brilliant start
Oh, well played, sirs. Way to not fall into the dreaded let's-at-least-use-the-second-stupid-thing-that-pops-into-our-collective-head trap.
The Santa Fe Concert Association commenced its 75th anniversary season in grand style, bringing to the stage of the Lensic Performing Arts Center soprano Susanna Phillips among others.
If I were the arts director, I'd bring her to the stage by herself — as befits the featured artist — and leave the “others” sort of in the background. What? It was just a missing comma? Oh, never mind, then, newspaper-that-thinks-I-should-pay-for-its-awesome-online-content.
Phillips, seen in August on public television’s Mozart concert, is quickly and rightfully becoming one of the most celebrated singers in the country. A veteran of three Mozart leads at the Santa Fe Opera, she sings two primary roles at the Metropolitan Opera this season.
She does and/or will?
Conducted by Joseph Illick, she opened the program with the “Four Last Songs” by Strauss.
I'm a little confused about agency here; I admit that this might be my own problem.
Somber songs about death are not exactly the most festive work to begin a gala opening concert, but from a performance of such radiant beauty there were anything but objections.
Okay; no. It's not just me. Prepositions aren't interchangeable and/or to be omitted ad libitum. The first phrase, which has a prepositional deficiency so severe it likely has scurvy, gives way to a second clause implying that the performance was so exquisite it didn't even object to itself.
With long, warm phrasing she gave heartfelt meaning to each of the poems. Illick carefully gauged the tempos of the predominantly string sonority to allow her a maximum of expression.
One notes with interest that the author of the review is himself a composer; this is a nice insight.
Phillips then returned for selections from Mendelssohn’s Symphony No. 2, “Lobgesang,” which includes chorus, soprano and mezzo-soprano.
Selections? They didn't play the whole symphony? You stay classy, Santa Fe Concert Association.
Here in contrast to the introspective Strauss, she let loose the full power and luster of her voice and shone brilliantly above the orchestral textures.
Still working on that “diamond” thing, eh? Was that with or without conspiring with the title-writing editor to keep up the lame, lame joke?
Linda Raney’s chorus too sang with an unbridled optimism, creating a “joyful noise” most appropriate to the occasion.
The scare quotes lead me to believe that the reviewer thinks that the chorus was awful—but enthusiastic!
Pro Tip: Do not use fucking scare quotes in your writing.
Mezzo-soprano Jamie Barton sang two small roles with the Santa Fe Opera this summer, both, unfortunately, too short to give us anything but a glimpse of her outstanding talent.
“Both” is not the same as “each.” That difficulty is overcome, however; even though each [sic] of her small roles was too short to allow an accurate assessment of her talent, said assessment is nevertheless undertaken.
Here too, frustratingly, we heard only one or two short solo passages other than the voice in duet with Phillips.
One or two? Lost count, did we? Wait; maybe I'm confused. There were two singers. What was that last bit again?
...other than the voice in duet with Phillips.
Now I'm more confused than ever. I don't know what that means. The addition or subtraction of a comma and/or preposition (if I have understood the rules of the column-game so far) won't even help.
I, for one, hope to hear more of her rich, hearty mezzo in future.
I, for one, hate clichéd stock phrases. I, for one, will also not be referring to the Albuquerque Journal for information about future local arts events. I, for one, will, further, not address the rest of this review.
I would, however, be remiss if I didn't mention the end of the article.
Appreciative congratulations to the SFCA in this most auspicious 75th season. 1937 had to be a good year. It heralded, as the program notes reminded, the introduction of Spam.
Points for the delightful non sequitur, even if it was cribbed from the program notes.
6/21/11
Concert ruined by programming Schumann
The following article really isn't a bad article. I really should say that it is indeed a good review. This is the Anne Midgette I enjoy reading. She is a fine writer with an attention to argument and word choice that appeals to my particular tastes. But despite my favorable opinion of this review, it left me with a couple of observations I thought needed making.
Music review: ‘Juggler in Paradise’ at NSO
Anne Midgette, Washington Post, June 10, 2011
Even in an article primarily dedicated to the work of a living composer, it appears that the relative dissonance is still the defining criteria of whether a piece is good or not.
Augusta Read Thomas writes music that is dense and smart but also listenable.
Oh, the false dichotomy...could there be a Detritus Review without you.
So...only dumb music is listenable? And therefore, all smart music is unlistenable?
Thick with complex rhythms, bright with textures, dappled with particular shades of dissonance alternating with snatches of melody, it doesn’t blatantly try to seduce the hearer, but it doesn’t want to be off-putting, either.
This is an interesting comment. In the hands of a lesser writer, I'm not sure this could be read in any other way than to say, "this piece is dissonant, but not too dissonant".
However, more intelligently written, I still think Midgette's point is simply to alleviate the dismissals of those who would, well, dismiss the music of living composers.
There are melodies, but not pretty ones. Got it.
Hers is emphatic music, making its points with a care that approaches the finicky, but it’s always looking over its shoulder to make sure that you’re following.
Sure, why not. Although, I'm not sure I'd ever call finicky music emphatic.
Its blend of intellect and accessibility makes her music very popular with orchestra programmers and conductors.
Okay, so here's that sentiment again, of her music's smartness/intellect. Doesn't this immediately beg the question, what makes her music "smart"?
Rather than immediately starting in with an assessment of her music's dissonance levels, why not explain the very opening sentence -- "Augusta Read Thomas writes music that is dense and smart but also listenable." You have three adjectives here...why must listenable be our only focus?
And in this case, listenable seems to ultimately equal levels of dissonance and consonance.
Of course, smart and dense in music are not as easily defined as I think is assumed here. I know I'm nitpicking Midgette here somewhat, but it seems especially frustrating when she has so many good things to say in her review.
Also, I don't want to disregard this matter of a piece being "listenable". However, I do find that very word to an uninviting place to start. Are there really unlistenable pieces out there?
It's an absurd sort of phrasing -- pieces of music whose sounds cannot be perceived by human ears, or cause so much pain to be safe for aural consumption?
Fine, I'm being too literal. Like I said, I don't wish to ignore listenability. All music must grapple with it's accessibility and it's popular appeal, even if it wishes to disregard them.
And this leads me back to Ms. Midgette's review of Thomas' concerto...
[snip]
The music, though, might not be so popular with audiences.
Interesting. Her smart but listenable music isn't popular with audiences? Any thoughts?
Eight pieces in two decades by one orchestra is an excellent track record for a composer in her 40s, yet it’s hardly enough to breed familiarity among the public.
So, this isn't her fault? Is it that by new music standards, popular still equals rarely performed?
Despite Eschenbach’s presence and the work’s presentation between two slices of Schumann (the “Braut von Messina” overture on one side, the second symphony on the other), Thursday’s audience was sparse.
See, I would blame Schumann for that.
And the crowd seemed oddly untouched by the piece,...
Really? How did you come to this conclusion?
As our lawyer friends might point, are you really testifying as to how some 1000 other people felt on the night of June 9th?
But, I guess I get it, the piece must not be listenable enough.
...a 20-minute arc in which the violin trails through the orchestra and accumulates sounds, like a strand of string picking up sugar crystals to form rock candy.
Ugh. Say no more. I hate rock candy. As I assume everyone in attendance did as well.
Thomas makes emphatic gestures built of sometimes unperceived subtleties, repeating them, with a kind of stuttering effect, to make sure you’ve got it.
Unperceived subtleties repeated until I get them?
If not prefaced with this idea that the audience was untouched, or didn't like the piece, I'm mostly happy with these interesting, if not poetic observations. Perfectly in line with your standard review, however...what does this have to do with your line of argument regarding listenability?
“Juggler in Paradise” — its epithet perhaps one of the less successful of Thomas’s signature poetic titles — is a Harlequin-like piece spangled with bells and wood blocks, in which the violin solos are often joined by bongo drums, or lead into passages of big-band jazziness. At one point, the orchestra held its breath for a solo bongo cadenza, then pounced with a quick powerful chord, like a cat leaping on a mouse.
Sounds like a cool piece. So what in the hell is the problem?
In short, it’s a piece shot through with antic humor, and yet it’s a little too self-conscious to be truly funny.
Oh. You thought the piece was supposed to be funny?
Posted by Gustav at 1:35 PM 3 comments
Labels: Anne Midgette, augusta read thomas, dissonance, listenable music, Washington Post
5/20/11
Friday Quickie: That's not something you see everyday
It's a slow news cycle here in the detritus world of music criticism. And as such...
Symphony in A minor a minor disappointment
Oh. Dear. God.
This week's Minnesota Orchestra concerts, heard Thursday at Orchestra Hall, mark the climax of its season-long Rachmaninoff symphony cycle.
I think the story here is that the Minnesota Orchestra has completely given up on programming good music.
Har har har...see what I did there?
Sorry, I'm sure some of you out there just love Rachmaninoff...but just admit it, you're totally wrong. Right?
Rachmaninoff's Symphony No. 3 in A minor is the composer's final symphony and one of the last of his orchestral works.
In fact that the only other orchestral work he composed (Symphonic Dances) was the only other piece he wrote at all until his death seven years after this symphony. Just saying.
As such, it is a nice pairing with the contrastingly youthful "Firebird."
Sure, what the hell.
The first movement opens in deep melancholy, perhaps expressing Rachmaninoff's sense of loss and of time passing.
Perhaps. But if you're basing this on the fact that you heard the Dies Irae, you should note that every piece Rachmaninoff ever wrote has the Dies Irae in it...or something like that.
So, how was this symphony "a minor" disappointment?
Wigglesworth missed the depth of emotion, stressing orchestral precision over passion, the result feeling somewhat cerebral and cold.
Well, that's not something you read everyday. Rachmaninoff -- "cerebral"? Surely you jest.
----------------------------------
Actually, Rachmaninoff's music isn't not cerebral. It's just so much more common for his music to be inundated with superlatives extolling the emotional genius of his music. I mean, it's not like he's Bruckner or something.
Posted by Gustav at 1:55 PM 0 comments
Labels: Friday Quickie, Minnesota Orchestra, Puns, Rachmaninoff, Star Tribune, title fail, William Randall Beard
5/13/11
Friday Quickie: Comparison wasn't not apt
Making an analogy, or even a direct comparison, can be an illuminating device when talking about abstract concepts. Of course, some people use them in place of an actual point, but Richard Nilsen has a point...just not a good comparison.
Symphony review: Singer Addis punks out on Mahler songs
Richard Nilsen, Arizona Republic, Apr. 22, 2011
“Punks out”?
…
Okay, how did Addis punk out on Mahler?
Phillip Addis wasn't no Sinatra.
Wait. Phillip Addis was not no Sinatra?
So… Phillip Addis is Sinatra?
The baritone sang Gustav Mahler's "Songs of a Wayfarer" with the Phoenix Symphony this week…
Wait…the singer who's not no Sinatra sang Mahler?
How’d he do?
…and the performance was a major letdown.
Well, Sinatra wasn’t known for his Mahler performances.
Sometimes you wait a whole season for a particular concert, because the music scheduled isn't merely beautiful or entertaining, but promises emotional transport.
I wish I had something clever to say here, but really, this is something unique that a symphony orchestra has the power to do but so rarely does. And this seems especially true since they rely so consistently upon the same pieces that have already emotionally transported me many times before.
After all, that is why we who love classical music persist in a love for a dying art form: It can take us out of ourselves and leave us feeling the radiance of the universe.
The art form isn’t dying, it’s just that people always insist on performing pieces that people already know they love.
The classical music universe is definitely not expanding the way most orchestras program.
It is almost a drug and we crave it.
Exactly. But we digress.
So, I’m assuming you love the Mahler “Songs of a Wayfarer” and you wished Sinatra were singing them? …
And when something like the Mahler sits there on the calendar all year, beckoning us to wait for its April date, we hope once again for that emotional and spiritual fix.
Oh, come on, Mahler’s on the calendar every year. But, I guess I know what you mean.
Well, perhaps you can expect too much.
If you expected Sinatra to sing your Mahler, perhaps you did expect too much.
It wasn't that Addis sang badly.
Oh. Was his diction good?
Certainly his diction was good.
Good. Music is all about diction.
As if music were about diction.
Wait? Music’s not about diction?
But the Sinatra comparison is dead on:…
Are you sure, because I can’t even begin to imagine why you’d compare this singer to Sinatra.
…When you heard Frank Sinatra sing, you knew - or felt you knew - that he had lived every word of the song he sang.
And there’s never been a classical singer who you felt this about before? Perhaps even someone who has sang the Mahler before?
The emotional intelligence he brought to lyrics meant that even as his voice declined, his ability to put across a song never wavered.
Exactly. Like when he sang:
Come fly with me, let's float down to Peru
In llama land there's a one-man band
And he'll toot his flute for you
I totally feel like he’s been to Peru, in a way no other artist could.
And the emotional content in lyrics like:
She'll have no crap games with sharpies and frauds
And she won't go to Harlem in Lincolns or Fords
And she won't dish the dirt with the rest of the broads
That's why the lady is a tramp
When he sang that, I could feel that this woman really eschewed the cultured, high-society conventions of her day...like not driving domestic automobiles.
It was what was missing from Addis' performance: He never convinced us - never even tried to convince us - that the words actually mean anything.
This seems fair. But did you really need Sinatra to make this point?
The styles of singing (and the songs themselves) really don't have a lot in common.
He sang as if he had memorized the words, not internalized them. It is at such times that you realize that mere musicality isn't enough: Great art isn't about pretty.
Couldn’t agree with this more… Wait, are you saying Sinatra wasn’t a good singer?
[snip]
But you're making what I would a consider a valid and important observation about the performance...are you sure there isn't a more apt comparison you could provide to help us understand your argument?
If you have ever heard Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau sing these songs, you know how far we have fallen.
Thank you.
See, I don’t know that recording, but this seems like a much better comparison. You've now created a workable reference point for people who know the Mahler songs. Plus, I’m actually likely to seek out this recording to understand better your frame of reference.
Maybe it's just me, but I find this far more illustrative.
Posted by Gustav at 10:22 AM 0 comments
Labels: apt comparisons, editors go to seedy motels to come up with titles, Frank Sinatra, Friday Quickie, Gustav mahler, RIchard Nilsen, The Arizona Republic




















